
My friend and colleague (and many or yours) Stephanie Nestlerode has crafted a submission to the new Open Government Dialogue website - one very attuned to all of us who are working with engaging communities whether online or face-to-face. We have an opportunity to support this suggestion by voting for it. PLEASE VOTE TODAY. It's super easy but time limited.
Here's what Stephanie says:
Just like athletes, they [public sector employees] need a practice field with coaching to make the organizational system changes required to make public participation a true reality. Many leaders hold the intention to be open, transparent and collaborative, but they do not possess the knowledge, skills and attitudes required. Research shows that clarity on strategic intent and a positive learning culture are essential. Studies also show that these elements are often missing in the public sector. What are the consequences? What do we know about what creates success?She offers a research foundation for her suggestion from a study by the National Research Council that states:
when done well, public participation improves the quality and legitimacy of a decision and builds the capacity of all involved to engage in the policy process.There is also a caution -- that public participation done poorly can be worse than not having included the public at all!
When the research is coupled with experience we gain a sense of clarity. Stephanie has been engaged with supporting leaders in both Colorado and Kansas in their attempt to create a dual-state learning partnership. She speaks clearly to the issues involved in creating a practice field of leaders willing to learn together as they perfect their respective leadership practices toward perfecting public service.
Take a moment and read these 419 words and cast your vote today before time runs out. It will only take a moment.
What have you learned about establishing engaging public (community) participation? What would you add?







